Objective: Squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) are classified as low-grade SIL (LGSIL) and high-grade SIL (HGSIL). ‘LGSIL cannot exclude high grade’ (LGSIL-H) interpretive category has been used in cases where findings exceed criteria for LGSIL, but do not fulfill the criteria for HGSIL. This study analyzed follow-up histology of LGSIL-H cases and compared the follow-up results of LGSIL-H with LGSIL to determine the utility of LGSIL-H category using a single institution’s experience. Study Design: Pap smears with LGSIL-H interpretation from 2005 to 2008 were retrieved. Histological follow-up results for LGSIL-H cases were analyzed and compared to the follow-up results of LGSIL cases. Results: Cases with LGSIL-H interpretation (311) comprised 0.18% of all cases (170,307). Follow-up was available for 144 patients and 13.2% had benign findings, 51.4% had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, and 35.4% had CIN 2 or higher. In comparison, of 425 patients with LGSIL, 22.6% had benign findings, 71% had CIN 1 and 6.4% had CIN 2 or higher. Conclusion: A significantly greater number of patients with LGSIL-H interpretation had a CIN 2 or higher lesion on follow-up compared to patients with LGSIL. This suggests LGSIL-H may be a useful diagnostic category.

Keywords:
Cytopathology, Squamous intraepithelial lesions, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.