Objective: The goal of this study was to report an experience with thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases that can be placed into National Cancer Institute-designated thyroid FNA diagnostic categories for follicular patterned lesions divided into three diagnostic categories: follicular lesion of undetermined significance/atypia of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFON), and suspicious for malignancy. Study Design: The study cohort included 4,284 cases for the period between January 2007 and July 2011 and all available follow-up data was obtained. All cases classified as ‘atypical’ and ‘rule out follicular neoplasm’ were included in the AUS/FLUS category (n = 3,903), whereas cases classified as ‘suspicious for’ or ‘consistent with follicular or Hürthle cell neoplasm’ (n = 381) were included in the SFON diagnostic category and compared with histopathologic follow-up. Results: During this period, 14,628 thyroid FNAs were reported in 12,238 patients. Repeat FNA (RFNA) was performed in 1,366/3,903 (35%) patients classified as AUS/FLUS. Histologic outcome data was available in 1,756/3,903 (45%) cases diagnosed as AUS/FLUS and 243/381 (64%) cases diagnosed as SFON. The rate of malignancy in AUS/FLUS cases with and without RFNA was 29 and 14% respectively, and it was 26% in SFON cases. Conclusion: The current data shows that the malignancy rates differ between categories and AUS/FLUS cases are best managed by RFNA for selection of cases that can benefit from surgical excision.

Keywords:
Bethesda, Fine-needle aspiration, Follicular patterned lesions, Thyroid
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.