Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) and to analyze the causes of unclear diagnoses following BSRTC adoption. Study Design: According to the BSRTC, we reclassified cytologic samples originally diagnosed as ‘indeterminate’ with sequential surgical resection. Then, we analyzed the causes of cases, which were recategorized as ‘atypia undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS)’. Results: According to the BSRTC, 154 ‘indeterminate’ cases were reclassified as follows: unsatisfactory, n = 5 (3.2%); benign, n = 43 (27.9%); AUS/FLUS, n = 77 (50.0%); suspicious for a follicular neoplasm, n = 7 (7.1%); suspicious for a Hürthle cell neoplasm, n = 4 (2.6%); suspicious for malignancy, n = 15 (9.7%), and malignancy, n = 3 (1.9%). Then, the AUS/FLUS group was analyzed according to the scenarios proposed by the BSRTC. Fifty-nine (58.9%) cases of AUS/FLUS were due to suboptimal preparation. In addition, papillary microcarcinoma and coexisting Hashimoto’s thyroiditis caused inconclusive diagnoses. Conclusion: The BSRTC can be easily applied to thyroid fine-needle aspiration. We were able to reclassify indeterminate thyroid nodules into more detailed categories and thus reduce the number of cases classified as indeterminate. However, suboptimal preparation, papillary microcarcinoma, and coexisting Hashimoto’s thyroiditis precluded cytopathologists from making definitive diagnoses.

Keywords:
Fine-needle aspiration, Indeterminate diagnosis, Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, Thyroid
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.