Objectives: It was the aim of this study to examine pancreatic cyst cases that lack markedly atypical or malignant epithelium on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective case review study, including 24 cases that were either acellular or lacked cytologic atypia and were subsequently resected. The cases were retrospectively divided into 3 categories: (1) non-diagnostic, (2) cyst contents only, and (3) cyst contents with bland-appearing epithelium. The cyst contents were subdivided into mucinous and non-mucinous types. The cytologic diagnoses were correlated with cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and subsequent histologic diagnoses. Results: Category 1 comprised 4 cases: 2 cases (CEA >800 ng/ml) with mucin-producing neoplasms and 2 cases (CEA not determined) with microcystic serous cystadenomas. Category 2 included 4 cases with non-mucinous and 4 with mucinous contents. In the first subgroup, 2 cases (CEA >800 ng/ml) showed mucinous cystic neoplasms and 2 cases (CEA negligible or not determined) pseudocysts. In the second subgroup, there were 3 cases with neoplastic mucinous cysts (1 CEA >800 ng/ml, 2 not determined) and 1 case with a lymphoepithelial cyst with mucinous metaplasia (CEA >800 ng/ml). Almost all cases (10/11) in category 3 had neoplastic mucinous cysts regardless of the CEA levels. Conclusions: The proposed 3 cytologic categories of pancreatic cystic lesion combined with cyst fluid CEA levels provide useful clinical information.

Keywords:
Pancreas, Mucinous cysts, Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration
1.
Spinelli KS, Fromwiller TE, Daniel RA, Kiely JM, Nakeeb A, Komorowski RA, Wilson SD, Pitt HA: Cystic pancreatic neoplasms: observe or operate. Ann Surg 2004;239:651–657.
2.
Zamboni G, Fukushima N, Hruban RH, Kloppel G: Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas; in Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (eds): WHO Classification of Tumors of the Digestive System. Lyon, IARC Press, 2010, pp 300–303.
3.
Hernandez LV, Mishra G, Forsmark C, Draganov PV, Petersen JM, Hocheald SN, Vogel SB, Bhutani MS: Role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis and treatment of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Pancreas 2002;25:222–228.
4.
Recine M, Kaw M, Evans DB, Krishnamurphy S: Fine-needle aspiration cytology of mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Cancer 2004;102:92–99.
5.
Leung KK, Ross WA, Evans D, Fleming J, Lin E, Tamm EP, Lee JH: Pancreatic cystic neoplasm: the role of cyst morphology, cyst fluid analysis, and expectant management. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:2818–2824.
6.
Sakorafas GH, Smyrniotis V, Reid-Lombardo KM, Sarr MG: Primary pancreatic cystic neoplasms revisited: part II. Mucinous cystic neoplasms. Surg Oncol 2011;20:e93–e101.
7.
Bellizzi AM, Stelow EB: Pancreatic cytopathology: a practical approach and review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:388–404.
8.
Layfield LJ, Jarboe EA: Cytopathology of the pancreas: neoplastic and nonneoplastic entities. Ann Diagn Pathol 2010;14:140–151.
9.
Pitman MB, Genevay M, Yaeger K, Chebib I, Turner BG, Mino-Kenudson M, Brugge WR: High-grade atypical epithelial cells in pancreatic mucinous cysts are a more accurate predictor of malignancy than ‘positive’ cytology. Cancer Cytopathol 2010;118:434–440.
10.
Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E, Centeno BA, Szydlo T, Regan S, del Castillo CF, Warshaw AL: Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology 2004;126:1330–1336.
11.
Van Der Waaij LA, van Dullemen HM, Porte RJ: Cyst fluid analysis in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions: a pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:383–389.
12.
Lim SJ, Alasadi R, Wayne JD, Rao S, Rademaker A, Bell R, Talamonti MS: Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions: cost-benefit analysis and proposed management algorithm. Surgery 2005;138:672–679.
13.
Khalid A, Brugge W: ACG practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2339–2349.
14.
Rogart JN, Loren DE, Singu BS, Kowalski TE: Cyst wall puncture and aspiration during EUS-guided fine needle aspiration may increase the diagnostic yield of mucinous cysts of the pancreas. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011;45:164–169.
15.
Lozano MD, Subtil JC, Miravalles TL, Echeveste JI, Prieto C, Betes M, Cienfuegos FJ, Idoate MA: EchoBrush may be superior to standard EUS-guided FNA in the evaluation of cystic lesions of the pancreas: preliminary experience. Cancer Cytopathol 2011;119:209–214.
16.
Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Falconi M, Shimizu M, Yamaguchi K, Yamao K, Matsuno S, International Association of Pancreatology: International consensus guideline for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2006;6:17–32.
17.
Michaels PJ, Brachtel EF, Bounds BC, Brugge WR, Pitman MB: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: cytologic features predict histologic grade. Cancer 2006;108:163–173.
18.
Sreenarasimhaiah J, Lara LF, Jazrawi SF, Barnett CC, Tang SJ: A comparative analysis of pancreas cyst fluid CEA and histology with DNA mutational analysis in the detection of mucin producing or malignancy cysts. JOP 2009;10:163–168.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.