Objective: To evaluate the relationship of the cytomorphology of medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTC) between family members with the same RET proto-oncogene mutation. Study Design: Review of the fine-needle aspiration slides of 13 cases with MTC proven by surgery and pathology from 5 unrelated families with either multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 2A or familial MTC (FMTC). Results: Small, round, and abundant large oval-to-polygonal cells were major cytomorphologic findings in 66.7% of family members with exon 11, codon 634 TGC → CGC germline mutation. Small, round cells and only a few or no polygonal cells were found in 66.7% of family members with exon 11, codon 634 TGC → TTC germline mutation and in 100% of family members with codon 634 TGC → TGG germline mutations, as well as in 100% of family members with exon 10, codon 620 TGC → GGC germline mutation. Conclusions: The high rate of similarity of cytomorphology (66.7–100%) in the family members with MEN type 2A or FMTC might be related to the same etiology in the production of MTC in the same family. The relationship of the respective cytomorphology with the long-term prognosis is worth elucidating further.

Keywords:
RET proto-oncogene, Cytomorphology, Fine-needle aspiration, Medullary thyroid carcinoma
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.