Objective: To compare the outcomes and evaluate the relative risk of thyroid cancer by using the UK thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytological diagnostic categories, with the main objective being the clarity of patient management. Study Design: Results of thyroid FNA reported as Thy3a, Thy3f, Thy4, and Thy5 were correlated with histological outcomes. The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV; risk of malignancy) for each reporting category was assessed. Results: Of a total of 873 thyroid FNAs, 237 (27%) were reported as ‘abnormal’: 40 (4.6%) as Thy3a, 119 (13.6%) as Thy3f, 20 (2.2%) as Thy4, and 58 (6.6%) as Thy 5. The final outcomes were available in 136 (57%) cases which underwent surgical resection (25, 60, 55, and 74% of Thy3a, Thy3f, Thy4, and Thy5, respectively). The known outcomes of the Thy3a category were too low to be statistically significant. The specificity and PPV of the Thy3f, Thy4, and Thy5 (equivalent to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) IV, V, and VI) categories were 50, 50, and 100% and 28, 64, and 100%, respectively. The PPV of Thy3f for diagnosis of ‘neoplasms’ (benign and malignant) was 63%. Conclusion: The current thyroid FNA classification system used in the UK, which is comparable to TBSRTC, offers a sound basis for clear communication on which the management of patients with abnormal thyroid FNA findings can be based. Categories Thy3f, Thy4, and Thy5 carry a progressively rising risk of malignancy, justifying their continuing use. Diagnostic category Thy5 ‘malignant’ is robust and can be used as a sure indication of a definitive surgical management.

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.