Objective: We previously reported on the classification of the nuclear chromatin distribution into 3 types, that is peripheral (P), mixed (M) and central (C), which were related to the malignancy of cervical glandular lesions. However, the classification was subjective as it was performed by visual assessment. In the present study, quantitative assessment of nuclear chromatin distribution using image analysis by computer was applied for objective classification of cervical squamous epithelial lesions, which are the most common cervical lesions. Study Design: A total of 130 cells (44 cells of type P, 78 of type M and 8 of type C) from cytological specimens of cervical squamous epithelial lesions (dysplasia, squamous cell carcinoma) were analyzed. An image analysis program was developed as a plug-in macro program of an existing image processing software. The radial distribution (RD) value, which represents the gradient of the staining intensity from the center to the edge of a nucleus, was defined as an index of the chromatin distribution. Results: The RD values calculated in type P, type M and type C cells showed significant statistical differences as assessed by the t test (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Quantification of the nuclear chromatin distribution by image analysis is fast and highly objective. The RD value could be useful as an index for malignancy.

Shamoto M, Osamura Y: Cytology. Nagoya, The University of Nagoya Press, 2001, pp 48–50.
Mizoguchi K: Standard Cyto-Diagnosis Text. Tokyo, Ishiyaku, 2002, pp 28–29.
Boon ME, Drijver JS: Routine Cytological Staining Techniques. London, Macmillan, 1986, pp 3–8.
Nishi K: Textbook of Clinical Cytology. Osaka, Kindai Shuppan, 2007, pp 24–27.
Watanabe S, Noguchi M, Uchiyama M, Yokoyama M, Matsuyama T, Kaku T, Iwasaka T, Sugimori H: The analysis of intranuclear chromatin distribution in cervical glandular abnormalities. Kyushu Bran Jpn Soc Clin Cytol 2003;33:111–115.
Watanabe S, Iwasaka T, Yokoyama M, Uchiyama M, Kaku T, Matsuyama T: Analysis of nuclear chromatin distribution in cervical glandular abnormalities. Acta Cytol 2004;48:505–513.
Young IT, Verbeek PW, Mayall BH: Characterization of chromatin distribution in cell nuclei. Cytometry 1986;7:467–474.
Tezuka F, Chiba R, Takahashi T: Morphometrical and statistical detection of cancer cells. Jpn J Cancer Chemother 1994;21:314–319.
Tanaka N: Automated cytologic screening system – history and current status – the state of art. J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol 2001;40:172–175.
Murata S, Mochizuki K, Nakazawa T, Nakamura N, Yamashita H, Urata Y, Ashihara T, Katoh R: Detection of underlying characteristics of nuclear chromatin patterns of thyroid tumor cells using texture and factor analyses. Cytometry 2002;49:91–95.
Lanctôt C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T: Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet 2007;8:104–115.
Murata S, Nakazawa T, Ohno N, Terada N, Iwashina M, Mochizuki K, Kondo T, Nakamura N, Yamane T, Iwasa S, Ohno S, Katoh R: Conservation and alteration of chromosome territory arrangements in thyroid carcinoma cell nuclei. Thyroid 2007;17:489–496.
Kress C, Ballester M, Devinoy E, Rijnkels M: Epigenetic modifications in 3D: nuclear organization of the differentiating mammary epithelial cell. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2010;15:73–83.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.