Background: Blastomycosis is caused by a dimorphic fungus that can be difficult to diagnose in certain situations. The disease is sometimes serious and can be deadly. Diagnosis by fungal serology and urinary antigens is not easy to establish and unreliable. Culture is also time-consuming and is not easy to perform. Thus, documentation of such an organism on cytology offers a quick and cost-effective alternative. This report describes for the first time identification of the ‘negative image’ of Blastomyces budding yeast. Case: A 79-year-old man presented with a left lung nodule associated with mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. Fine needle aspiration was performed, and a ‘negative image’ of a yeast with wide base budding was noted on Diff-Quik (DQ)-stained smears. Blastomyces species were confirmed with periodic acid-Schiff fungal stain. Additionally, the fungal capsule contained focally polarizable material on Congo red stain and lacked mucin with mucicarmine stain. Conclusion: Blastomyces yeast forms can be easily identified with DQ staining by their ‘negative image’. This feature can be utilized as a quick and cost-effective cytological characteristic to further triage these specimens for confirmation. The information can be of great value to clinicians in making appropriate clinical decisions.

Keywords:
Blastomycosis, Negative image, Diff-Quik stain
1.
Procop GW, Wilson M: Infectious disease pathology. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:1589–1601.
2.
Hirschowitz SL, Mandell D, Nieberg RK, Carson K: The alcohol-fixed Diff-Quik stain. A novel rapid stain for the immediate interpretation of fine needle aspiration specimens. Acta Cytol 1994;38:499–501.
3.
Mendoza ML, Martín-Rabadán P, Carrión I, Morillas JD, López-Alonso G, Diaz-Rubio M: Helicobacter pylori infection. Rapid diagnosis with brush cytology. Acta Cytol 1993;37:181–185.
4.
Carmona T, Muñoz E, Abad MM, Paz JI, Gómez F, Alonso MJ, Sánchez A, Bullón A: Usefulness of antral brushing samples stained with Diff-Quik in the cytologic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. A comparative methodologic study. Acta Cytol 1995;39:669–672.
5.
Mendoza ML, Martín-Rabadán P, Carrión I, Morillas JD, López-Alonso G, Diaz-Rubio M: Helicobacter pylori infection. Rapid diagnosis with brush cytology. Acta Cytol 1993;37:181–185.
6.
Reyes CV: Diff-Quik cytologic recognition of Chlamydophila psittaci in orolabial lesions of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. Acta Cytol 2010;54:692–694.
7.
Kyriazis AP, Kyriazis AA: Incidence and distribution of opportunistic lung infections in AIDS patients related to intravenous drug use: a study of bronchoalveolar lavage cytology by the Diff-Quik stain. Diagn Cytopathol 1993 ;9:487–491.
8.
Casanova-Cardiel LJ, Cedillo-Rivera R, Garduño-Rodríguez G, Muñoz O: Comparison of 2 dyes in the detection of Pneumocystis carinii. Rev Invest Clin 1996;48:443–447.
9.
Stanley MW, Horwitz CA, Burton LG, Weisser JA: Negative images of bacilli and mycobacterial infection: a study of fine-needle aspiration smears from lymph nodes in patients with AIDS. Diagn Cytopathol 1990;6:118–121.
10.
Domfeh AB, Nodit L, Gradowski JF, Bastacky S: Mycobacterium kansasii infection diagnosed by pleural fluid cytology: a case report. Acta Cytol 2007;51:627–630.
11.
Ang GA, Janda WM, Novak RM, Gerardo L: Negative images of mycobacteria in aspiration biopsy smears from the lymph node of a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS): report of a case and a review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:325–328.
12.
Wallace J: Pulmonary blastomycosis: a great masquerader. Chest 2002;121:677–679.
13.
Hussein R, Khan S, Levy F, Mehta JB, Sarubbi FA: Blastomycosis in the mountainous region of northeast Tennessee. Chest 2009;135:1019–1023.
14.
Larone DH: Medically Important Fungi: A Guide to Identification, ed 4. Washington, ASM Press, 2002, p 50.
15.
Axelson GK, Giorgadze T, Youngberg GA: Evaluation of the use of Congo red staining in the differential diagnosis of Candida vs. various other yeast-form fungal organisms. J Cutan Pathol 2008;35:27–30.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.