Background: In recent years, important advances have been made in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and new strategies have been put forward for its treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyze the cytomorphometric changes and glycogen content in exfoliated cells of oral mucosa as an adjunct in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Method: The smears were taken from buccal mucosa of 30 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (study group) and 30 healthy individuals (control group). One smear was stained with rapid Papanicolaou stain and the other with periodic acid Schiff stain (PAS). In Papanicolaou stain smears, the nuclear area, cytoplasmic area and cytoplasmic to nuclear ratio were evaluated from 50 cells in each smear using Image analysis software (Q Win Standard, Leica™) and a research microscope (DM 2500, Leica). PAS-stained smears were analyzed for the presence of glycogen in exfoliated cells. Results: The results showed that the mean nuclear area was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the study group whereas the mean cytoplasmic area did not exhibit a statistically significant difference (p > 0.001). The mean cytoplasmic to nuclear ratio was significantly lower in the study group (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in the count of PAS-positive exfoliated cells of the study group as compared with the control group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results associated with clinical observations suggest that type 2 diabetes mellitus can produce morphologic and functional alterations in oral epithelial cells, detectable by microscopic and cytomorphometric analysis using exfoliative cytology which can be used in the diagnosis of the disease.

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.