Objective: To evaluate the potential diagnostic role of the myoepithelial marker p63 in fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of breast in comparison to other diagnostic tools. Study Design: A total of 49 FNAC of breast were assessed according to clinical, mammographic, cytological findings, and p63 immunostaining on FNAC. The strength of agreement with final histological diagnosis (FHD) was measured by kappa test. Results: p63 was positive in myoepithelial cells of 75% (9/12) of benign cases and negative in 89% (33/37) of the malignant cases with strong agreement with the FHD (p < 0.0001, ĸ = 0.63). All the malignant positive cases showed variable degrees of in situ component. Only one malignant case (1/37, 0.03%) showed few p63 positive neoplastic cells in FNAC. Combined FNAC and p63 staining (with <25% cutoff point) to diagnose malignancy showed 100% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 92% positive predictive value, 100% negative predictive value, and 94% diagnostic accuracy. Most of the cytologically suspicious cases (7/9, 78%) showed negative p63 staining results, and all these suspicious cases (100%) proved to be malignant by the FHD. There was poor agreement between diagnosis according to positive background naked nuclei (NN) and the FHD (ĸ = 0.24 and p < 0.0001); however, presence of more than 74% positive NN is strongly suggestive of fibroadenoma. Conclusion: p63 immunostaining with a cutoff value of <25% to diagnose malignancy is a highly sensitive and specific myoepithelial marker which is recommended as an adjuvant tool to FNAC of breast in suspicious cases.

Keywords:
p63 immunostaining, Breast cancer, Cytology
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.