Objective: To analyze reasons for unclear or missed diagnoses in fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Study Design: Among 35,000 thyroid FNAB diagnoses made during 1989–2009, 135 PTC FNAB diagnoses were divided into 3 categories by expressed probability. A group of 10 cases with histologic PTC diagnosis not mentioned in our previous FNAB sample was also analyzed. Results: Of the 75 PTC FNAB diagnoses, 71 were confirmed; the remaining 4 were hyperplastic goiters. In the group of 45 cases with PTC, in which FNAB diagnosis was the next most probable differential diagnosis, 23 were confirmed. In the group of 15 cases, in which the PTC FNAB diagnosis was considered the less probable differential diagnosis, 3 PTCs were found. The other cases in both groups were usually histologically diagnosed as lymphocytic thyroiditis. In the group of 10 cases with histologic PTC diagnosis, 6 were evaluated as suspicious for (other) malignancy, 3 were diagnosed as hyperplasia with oncocytes and 1 as low cellularity; sample reaspiration was recommended. Conclusion: FNAB diagnosis of PTC is not always possible, with success rate influenced by lesion type and size, accompanying diagnoses, representativeness of cytology sample and experience of the cytopathologist.

Keywords:
Thyroid nodule, Diagnostic probability, Fine needle aspiration biopsy, Papillary thyroid carcinoma
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.