The purpose of this investigation was to examine histological changes in nasal septal cartilage due to alteration of dietary consistency and loss of incisor function. Sixteen female, weanling Sprague-Dawley rats (Rattus norvegicus), were subjected to one of the following feeding treatments: control rats (n = 7) received a standard pelleted chow; experimental rats (n = 9) received meal sufficient in calories and nutrients to sustain increases in body weight. The maxillary incisors of experimental rats were trimmed to the level of the gingiva on alternate days to minimize anterior occlusal loading associated with nonfeeding behaviors. Rats were killed at 13 weeks, the nasal septa prepared for histology and the dimensions of septal cartilage and mucoperichondrium were measured. Quantitative and qualitative comparisons between control and experimental rats revealed a lack of significant differences in size, shape and thickness of septal cartilage and mucoperichondrium. The results of this study provide support for the concept that postnatal growth of primary cranial cartilages is largely independent of extrinsic biomechanical forces.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.