The cells present in the alimentary canal, contacting both nerve endings and smooth muscle cells and named interstitial cells of Cajal, show different ultrastructural features. A comparative study has been performed in order to see if these differences can be related to the animal species studied or to the interstitial cell localizations inside the muscle wall of the various levels of the alimentary canal or to their contacts with other cells. Only mammals were considered, and rat, mouse, hedgehog and man have been studied. All the localizations where interstitial cells of Cajal have usually been found were considered: esophagus (body and lower sphincter), stomach (gastric extent of the lower esophageal sphincter, fundus and corpus) small intestine and colon. From this comparison a correlation was found between the morphology and the location of interstitial cells. On the contrary, the morphological differences existing between animal species do not seem to be that consistent. Moreover, the number of contacts between interstitial cells and between these and smooth muscle cells and nerve endings varies according to the interstitial cell location and morphology. It is concluded that the chain nerve endings → interstitial cells of Cajal → smooth muscle cells is not morphologically identical at each gastrointestinal level, and this finding is considered very important in interpreting the role played by the interstitial cells of Cajal in gastrointestinal motility.

Keywords:
Interstitial cells of Cajal, Smooth muscle, Gastrointestinal tract
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1987 S. Karger AG, Basel
1987
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.