A study of the distribution of extracellular matrix vesicles on the 6th day of bone healing was performed by methods of transmission electron microscopy combined with computerized morphometry. The vesicles were detected on the electron micrographs and grouped according to their diameters, distance from the calcified front and type. The different types were selected as follows: (a) vesicles with electron-lucent contents, i.e. ‘empty’; (b) vesicles with amorphous electron-opaque contents, i.e., ‘amorphous’; (c) vesicles containing crystalline depositions, i.e., ‘crystal’, and (d) vesicles containing crystalline structures with ruptured membranes, i.e. ‘rupture’. Most of the vesicles were concentrated between diameters of 0.02 and 0.22 µm. Most of the vesicles were found within a distance of less than 3 µm from the calcified front. The vesicles were distributed according to their types: ‘empty’, ‘amorphous’, ‘crystal’ and ‘rupture’ in 14, 39, 34 and 13%, respectively. The diameters of the ‘crystal’ and ‘rupture’ vesicles were significantly larger than those of the ‘empty’ and ‘amorphous’ types. The sequence of distances from the calcified front was recorded as follows: ‘rupture’, ‘crystal’, ‘amorphous’ and ‘empty’, the ‘rupture’ type being the closest to the front. The results of the present study confirm the accepted hypothesis on calcification via extracellular matrix vesicles. It is thought that the cell secretes ‘empty’ vesicles that accumulate amorphous Ca and P to form a hydroxyl-apatite crystal. This is followed by rupture of the vesicular membrane. The propagation of the process is accompanied by increase in the vesicular diameter and its approximation to the calcifying front.

Keywords:
Matrix vesicle distribution, Bone healing, TEM, Morphometry
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1987 S. Karger AG, Basel
1987
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.