In the second part of an experimental study of the behavior and fate of the roots of ectopically transplanted frog teeth the comparative aspects of the tooth root and its tissue composition were examined. Experimental results showed that the root or pedicel area of the frog tooth was an intrinsic part of the tooth. The tooth was capable of growth to normal size and shape with or without the presence of underlying bone. When compared with existing descriptive evidence and analysis it was determined that the best terminology for the amphibian root tissues would be dentin right up to the point of attachment where cellular basal bone is seen. This is because it is an intrinsic part of the tooth, is formed on the pulpal side of the root sheath, and is formed by odontoblasts. Because of the above observations, the original Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath appeared both homologous and analogous with the mammalian sheath, but since all the root tissues were under this sheath, no tissues homologous to any of the paradental tissues of cementum, periodontal ligament, or alveolar bone could be found except when the root sheath injury resulted in induction of an acellular tissue upon the outer surface of dentin.

Keywords:
Root formation, Comparative root tissues, Ectopic transplant, Ankylosed teeth
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1978 S. Karger AG, Basel
1978
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.